{"id":2861,"date":"2012-02-16T16:59:50","date_gmt":"2012-02-16T16:59:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/?p=2861"},"modified":"2018-10-10T11:25:56","modified_gmt":"2018-10-10T15:25:56","slug":"round-house-weirdness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/2012\/02\/round-house-weirdness\/","title":{"rendered":"Round House Weirdness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"lead\">Like a triple play or a blue moon, round houses are rare and wonderful things. But even though we always stop to look, we rarely buy. Round houses just don&#8217;t fit our image of home&#8211;a front door tucked under a gable roof. Instead, they look like something that&#8217;s just landed from another universe.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2864\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/IMG_2212.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2864\" class=\"size-large wp-image-2864 \" title=\"IMG_2212\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/IMG_2212-1024x768.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/IMG_2212-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/IMG_2212-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2864\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">howdy neighbor!<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Building materials may be one reason we live in boxes rather than bowls. Teepees and yurts made of cloth and skins are self-supporting without a foundation. Even more contemporary materials like steel and concrete can be molded into round structures. But most home-building is stick-built construction. It takes effort and skill to shape two-by-fours into a round structure. (A more subtle influence might be lot shape&#8211;you don&#8217;t find many circular pieces of property.)<\/p>\n<p>When we do build round, it&#8217;s often with a mission. In the 1850s, Orson Squire Fowler advocated his Octagonal Houses claiming they were cheaper to build and easier to heat. He was also an advocate of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phrenology\">phrenology <\/a>and wrote an advice book, &#8220;Perfection of Character.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2867\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/octagon_sm.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2867\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2867\" title=\"octagon_sm\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/octagon_sm-300x291.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"291\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/octagon_sm-300x291.jpg 300w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/octagon_sm.jpg 360w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2867\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">maybe the bumps on your skull mean you are confused by a round house<\/p><\/div>\n<p>More recent round houses include <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Buckminster_Fuller\">Buckminster Fuller&#8217;s Dymaxion House<\/a>, which he designed to use heat and water more efficiently. Fuller was a perfectionist and refused to begin production on an unfinished prototype. But\u00a0the Dymaxion house, which ignored local site conditions and architectural traditions, probably never would have become a popular new\u00a0neighbor.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2870\" style=\"width: 260px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/imagesCA1WWLH0.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2870\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2870\" title=\"imagesCA1WWLH0\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/imagesCA1WWLH0.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"202\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2870\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">pet goat notwithstanding, just not home sweet home<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The round house, may be shorthand for a kind of jet-pack futurism or ski lodge grooviness, but it&#8217;s not the kind of place we like to call home.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2868\" style=\"width: 309px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/ski-lodge.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2868\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2868\" title=\"ski lodge\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/ski-lodge.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"299\" height=\"169\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2868\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">what would Norman Rockwell say?<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"lead\">Like a triple play or a blue moon, round houses are rare and wonderful things. But even though we always stop to look, we rarely buy. Round houses just don&#8217;t fit our image of home&#8211;a front door tucked under a gable roof. Instead, they look like something that&#8217;s just landed from another universe.<\/p>\n<p>Building materials may be one reason we live in boxes rather than bowls. Teepees and yurts made of cloth and skins are self-supporting without a foundation. Even more contemporary materials like steel and concrete can be molded into round structures. But most home-building is stick-built construction. It takes effort and skill to shape two-by-fours into a round structure. (A more subtle influence might be lot shape&#8211;you &#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/2012\/02\/round-house-weirdness\/\" class=\"read-more\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3],"tags":[369,370,371,368],"class_list":["post-2861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-architecture","category-design","tag-buckminster-fuller","tag-dymaxion","tag-octagon-houses","tag-orson-squire-fowler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2861"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5278,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2861\/revisions\/5278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}