{"id":1405,"date":"2010-04-29T17:18:51","date_gmt":"2010-04-29T17:18:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/?p=1405"},"modified":"2026-03-23T12:29:00","modified_gmt":"2026-03-23T16:29:00","slug":"plop-plop-fizz-fizz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/2010\/04\/plop-plop-fizz-fizz\/","title":{"rendered":"Plop, plop, fizz, fizz &#8230;."},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"lead\">The debate over \u201cplop art\u201d continues \u2013 especially when art seems to provide more fizz than substance. Four sculptures by <a title=\"Niki de Saint Phalle Info\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Niki_de_Saint_Phalle\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Niki de Saint Phalle<\/a>, which now sit outside the <a title=\"NMWA Website\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nmwa.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Museum of Women in the Arts<\/a> on New York Avenue, have some wondering if our exterior public spaces are given the same respect as our hallowed museum walls.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-006.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1406\" title=\"de saint phalle 006\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-006-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-006-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-006.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-014.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1407\" title=\"de saint phalle 014\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-014-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-014-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-014.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>\n<p>Despite their rotund nature, our <a title=\"Post Article on de Saint Phalle\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/04\/27\/AR2010042703104.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">local Post critic<\/a> thinks they lack \u201cweight\u201d. Agreed. To a point. His take on it is that such engaging and fun works lack the potency of the subject matter on the canvases and sculptures within the area\u2019s museums; that there is a dichotomy between our expectations of exterior and interior sculptures. As noted, some of de Saint Phalle\u2019s earlier work has been more exuberantly confrontational and provocative, which these certainly aren\u2019t. No one is being asked to engage with their subconscious thoughts on sexuality, femininity, or aggression \u2013 or how these ideas trespass on each other.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1408\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-002.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1408\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1408\" title=\"de saint phalle 002\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-002-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-002-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-002.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1408\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Serpent Tree<\/p><\/div>\n<p>I agree that the most interesting of the four is \u201cSerpent Tree\u201d \u2013 there are plenty of myths and metaphors regarding trees and snakes to keep the mind occupied. And the execution in such colors, textures, and finishes keeps the eye equally occupied. Except for \u201cBasketball Player\u201d, which should only be permanently installed at the MJ Hall of Fame, I disagree with the assessment that the others will simply provoke a glimpse and a smile because of a lack of fizz beneath the surface \u2013 like fading effervescence that goes flat with time. Well, maybe I agree, but maybe that\u2019s all that can be asked. This is because of, and not despite, the location.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1409\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-009.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1409\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1409\" title=\"de saint phalle 009\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-009-200x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-009-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-009.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1409\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Basketball Player<\/p><\/div>\n<p>These are \u201cplop art\u201d in the sense that they are not connected to place \u2013 the glam is befitting NY or Milan, the hippy sentimentality is befitting San Francisco \u2013 neither \u201cfit\u201d DC. But they are temporary installations here and they do fit the space if not the place. They are large, eye-catching, colorful, and \u201cpretty\u201d. This contrasts with the asphalt and stone and concrete around them. They are set in a median between several lanes of traffic \u2013 they have to compete with a lot of noise and space. They compete relatively well; I did see someone actually cross the road to get close and take a video of one piece.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1410\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-004.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1410\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1410\" title=\"de saint phalle 004\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-004-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-004-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-004.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1410\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Three Graces<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_1411\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-007.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1411\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1411\" title=\"de saint phalle 007\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-007-200x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-007-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/de-saint-phalle-007.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1411\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Nana on a Dolphin<\/p><\/div>\n<p>This leaves me wondering whether a more \u201cthoughtful\u201d piece could work in such a space. I doubt it. Large, brash eye-candy is okay in some places. Something that does both would be wonderful, but in such a space would be exceedingly difficult \u2013 my vote would be for four trees \u2013 real or otherwise \u2026 \u201cI think that I shall never see, a [sculpture] as lovely as a tree\u201d\u2026.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1413\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/roxy.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1413\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1413\" title=\"roxy\" src=\"http:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/roxy-200x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/roxy-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/roxy.jpg 403w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1413\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Graft by Roxy Paine (National Gallery of Art Sculpture Garden)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"lead\">The debate over \u201cplop art\u201d continues \u2013 especially when art seems to provide more fizz than substance. Four sculptures by Niki de Saint Phalle, which now sit outside the National Museum of Women in the Arts on New York Avenue, have some wondering if our exterior public spaces are given the same respect as our hallowed museum walls.<\/p>\n<p>Despite their rotund nature, our local Post critic thinks they lack \u201cweight\u201d. Agreed. To a point. His take on it is that such engaging and fun works lack the potency of the subject matter on the canvases and sculptures within the area\u2019s museums; that there is a dichotomy between our expectations of exterior and interior sculptures. As noted, some of de &#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/2010\/04\/plop-plop-fizz-fizz\/\" class=\"read-more\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[115,9,116],"class_list":["post-1405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-design","tag-place","tag-public-art","tag-space"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1405"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11121,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405\/revisions\/11121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/montgomeryplanning.org\/blog-design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}